what’s in your backpack?

In the movie Up in the Air, George Clooney’s character is a motivational speaker that often gives a talk called, “What’s In Your Backpack?” He talks about how each of us is carrying around a metaphorical backpack that contains all of our possessions and commitments. Our backpacks get heavier and heavier until they are so filled with “stuff” that it is nearly impossible to move. George Clooney’s character argues that we should “set our backpacks on fire” and free ourselves from this burden. In terms of relationships, he makes the same argument but thankfully gives us permission to not set our backpacks full of family members, friends, and significant others on fire. Much like our backpack full of our possessions, our bag-o-relationships weighs us down and prevents us from being truly free and we should just walk away from it.

Up to a certain point, I was nodding right along with the talk as it was being given. I agree that we all carry around a metaphysical backpack with everything that weighs us down. Our possessions, commitments, relationships, responsibilities and our own goals overflow our backpacks until many of us have no chance of ever being able to move again. However, the point where I differ in philosophy from the movie is what we should do with our backpacks.

In my quest for simplicity, I am methodically removing everything from my backpack and asking myself if it is truly something I need to be carrying with me. In terms of physical items, this is why I am committed to living a more minimalist lifestyle with less, yet higher quality, possessions. I do not need the extra weight of a large wardrobe or a room full of video games. Most importantly, everything I decide to keep in my backpack is something I have consciously decided to keep around. I think many people have no idea what is in their backpack and yet wonder why it is so heavy.

In terms of relationships, I do not accept the philosophy of Clooney’s character. He lives a life completely devoid of personal relationships because he thinks they tie him down. I prefer to fill my backpack with relationships that I care about– to honestly ask myself what role they should play in my life. I’m not afraid to let friendships fizzle out that no longer make sense in maintaining. At the same time, I am fiercely committed to those relationships I deem worthwhile and important. I take the same approach to my relationships that I do my physical possessions; if I love it and it makes sense to keep, than I do. If it is no longer important to me, then I let it go.

As you try to live a life of greater simplicity, think about the backpack you are carrying around every day. Have you consciously allowed everything you are carrying around to enter your life? If not, you might want to take a moment to stop, empty your backpack, and make some decisions about what you are going to put back in before you continue killing yourself under the weight.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

This entry was posted on Tuesday, January 26th, 2010 at 5:00 am and is filed under simplicity. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

  • I didn't see the movie and also didn't see it in the movie theaters in my country.
  • Bob
    The writer misses the whole point of the philosophy, which is based on the idea that less is better in all areas of life, including relationships.
    The philosophy doesn't differentiate between "good" relationships and "bad" relationships. It says ALL relationships clutter up your life and weigh you down, hastening your demise.
    http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi1684406809/
  • Hmm. Well, I only saw the movie once and I guess I didn't get that interpretation from it. Even if what I wrote isn't what the movie was trying to portray, I still think my philosophy holds water. Thanks for taking the time to comment!
  • Sam
    @Charley

    I don't want to ruin the movie for anyone who hasn't seen it, but I'll just say that the ending is surprising...

    @365girl

    Ha!
  • 365girl
    Perhaps he purged his laptop to get to 100 Things? :-)
  • This is a great metaphor, Sam, even though it was probably cheesed up a bit in the movie. I heard this was a great movie and i assume that Clooney opens up his heart at the end to allow a relationship in.

    When it comes to physical possessions, i remember about three years ago there was a guy online called Rucksack Dave and he filled a large rucksack bag with everything he owned including cookware and utensils. If it didn;t fit, out it went. And I think he ended up with 101 items. He seems to be gone from the internet now, which is a shame.

    - Charley
blog comments powered by Disqus
 

Optimized by SEO Ultimate